I have worked in a handful of libraries, and do you know how many indie published books we carried? Honestly, not many. And I want to tell you why—because most authors didn’t do the things that allowed us to use our budget on their books.
I have worked in libraries in more than one state, inside systems with very different budgets and rules, and the fastest way to guarantee your book does not end up on a shelf is to place it in the return bin and hope someone discovers it. In most systems, returned items are processed by staff whose job is circulation, not curation, and unsolicited books move directly into the sale pile where they are priced to clear space, not to introduce readers to new authors.
In extremely small libraries with almost no purchasing budget, an abandoned copy might survive long enough to be cataloged, but that is the exception people cling to when they want to avoid learning how the process works everywhere else.
Walking in with copies of your book and asking the person at the desk to carry it fails for a similar reason. The person helping patrons find printers or library cards is rarely the person who selects inventory. Many libraries belong to regional systems, and the buyer may work offsite, reviewing lists and data rather than interacting with authors face to face. When writers describe these encounters as dismissive, what they are often experiencing is a structural mismatch, not personal rejection.
Before you approach anyone, you need to study the library itself. Look at the catalog and notice what they already invest in. Pay attention to programming, community focus, and whether they prioritize local authors, academic research, genre fiction, or children’s literature. Public libraries, university libraries, and specialty collections acquire books for different reasons, and pretending they are interchangeable leads to wasted effort.
Your book has to look like it belongs in the ecosystem it is entering. Libraries circulate books hundreds of times, and they expect professional editing, clean typography, durable formatting, and a cover with clear genre competence rather than experimentation. Self-published books are evaluated more cautiously, not because of bias, but because librarians are trained to protect limited budgets from titles that will not hold up under heavy use.
An ISBN is required, and it needs to be legitimate. Most libraries will not review a book without one, and ownership matters because it determines how the book can be ordered, tracked, and replaced.
If cold messaging a library, you also need materials that explain your book to someone who is reading dozens of acquisition entries at once. A precise synopsis, a brief author biography, and a clean informational sheet are enough, as long as they read like they were prepared by someone who understands institutional decision-making.
What changes outcomes more than any single document is relationship over time. Librarians notice patterns. They notice who attends events, who shows up consistently, who understands that libraries are workplaces. I have watched librarians advocate for books because they had seen the writer working in the same building week after week, finishing the manuscript in a public space that values sustained intellectual labor. Those stories circulate internally, and internal advocacy drives purchasing far more than cold submissions.
Many systems publish their acquisition policies online, including local author submission guidelines and suggestion forms. Many libraries will buy a book simply if X amount of people request they buy it (that number is set by the system). So you need to get your audience requesting their library buy copies!! This is so important. When multiple readers request the same title through the library’s suggestion system, it signals demand in a way that aligns with how libraries justify purchases. It takes very little effort from the requester, yet it carries weight that a single author inquiry never will.
Some libraries do not purchase self-published titles. Others do not buy directly from major retail platforms and rely on their wholesalers only, so if you are an Amazon-only author you will be SOL a lot of the time. Get in IngramSpark. Exclusivity agreements can limit discoverability within library systems, and while these constraints are shifting slowly, they are still part of the landscape writers need to understand.
Digital lending deserves attention as well. Platforms like OverDrive and Libby often provide a more accessible entry point than physical shelving, particularly for newer authors, and digital circulation data is reviewed alongside print usage when systems assess demand. Make sure the buyer knows this is an option.
Every library system operates differently. Books end up on shelves because someone inside the system believes the book will serve readers, and that belief is built through quality, fit, and a shown interest from their patrons.
If you think these letters may intrigue or inspire someone you know, please forward this to them so that they may subscribe. |
Support Letters From Libby James
Engage.
- Respond to letters. Write me back!
- Like and share on LinkedIn.
- On Pinterest, save my pictures to your boards.
Subscribe.
- Get more great letters, more often.
- Supporting this newsletter means you’re investing in your own writing journey and honoring the work of a fellow creator. Here’s to the pages we’ll fill together.
Visit.
Fuel.
- If you find value in these letters consider making a small donation to my chai/reading fund that keeps me writing. Venmo: @LibbyCJames
- Pick my next read. Select something from my wish list. All physical books are donated to my rural school when finished to ensure diverse reading in the community.
Share.
- Send this letter to a creative being who would love it. Encourage them to subscribe.
|
